A defined review. A practical plan.

The SaaS Technical
Health Check.

A focused review of one SaaS application and its supporting systems. Understand the material risks, the architectural constraints, and the work worth prioritizing before committing more time or budget.

Talk to Jonathan
$2,500 fixed fee

For one application and an agreed set of review questions. The proposal names the supporting systems, evidence, review depth, delivery date, written report, and debrief. Broader investigations and implementation are quoted separately.

YOUR TECHNICAL HEALTH CHECK

A clear assessment.
An actionable roadmap.

Architecture & applicationReview area
Infrastructure & dataReview area
Security & engineeringReview area
CriticalHighMediumLow
Now
Address risk
Next
Build confidence
Later
Improve foundations

Illustrative report structure. Findings depend on your systems and the agreed review scope.

IS THIS THE RIGHT FIT?

Know what needs attention.

  • Founders who need an independent view of the software their business depends on.
  • SaaS teams preparing for growth, enterprise customers, or a significant new investment in development.
  • Leaders inheriting a platform with limited documentation or an unclear technical backlog.
SITUATIONS I CAN HELP WITH
01

You have a long list of technical concerns but no dependable way to separate business risk from engineering preference.

02

Performance, deployments, access controls, or recovery arrangements raise questions you cannot confidently answer.

03

You need a useful baseline before planning improvements, changing vendors, or expanding the product.

WHAT YOU LEAVE WITH

Findings you can act on.

An executive summary, evidence-based findings, and a practical 90-day roadmap organized into Now, Next, and Later.

Architecture and application

Review the application structure, important dependencies, system boundaries, and technical debt within the agreed scope.

Infrastructure and data

Examine the available cloud configuration, database design, performance evidence, monitoring, backups, and recovery approach.

Security and engineering process

Review selected access controls, logging, vulnerability handling, deployment practices, and software development controls.

Findings with context

Receive an executive summary and documented findings rated Critical, High, Medium, or Low, where applicable, with impact, evidence, and review limitations.

A roadmap and debrief

Work through prioritized recommendations, architecture observations, and a practical 90-day plan in a review session. See what belongs in Now, Next, and Later.

THE ENGAGEMENT

A clear process.
Shared expectations.

01

Define the review

Agree on one application, the questions that matter, the evidence available, and the access needed. Confirm the fixed scope before starting.

02

Assess the evidence

Review the agreed systems, documentation, and engineering practices. Distinguish confirmed findings from gaps that need further investigation.

03

Make the next work clear

Deliver the findings and roadmap, discuss the tradeoffs, and identify the most useful next actions with your team.

SCOPE & BOUNDARIES

Know what
you’re engaging.

This is a scoped technical assessment, not a comprehensive code audit, penetration test, compliance certification, or guarantee that every issue will be found. Remediation and ongoing implementation are separate engagements. Conclusions reflect the evidence and access available during the review.

Does the Health Check take 90 days?

The 90 days describe the improvement roadmap, not the assessment duration. We agree a delivery date before work starts, after confirming the systems, access, and people available. The schedule begins once the agreed inputs are ready.

What does the fixed fee cover?

One application within a review scope we agree together, a written findings report, a prioritized 90-day roadmap, and a debrief session. We confirm review depth and supporting systems before work starts so the boundaries are clear.

Will you need production access?

Access depends on the questions we agree to investigate. Read-only access, architecture documentation, configuration exports, or a guided walkthrough may be appropriate. Any access limitations will be reflected in the findings.

Can our existing team implement the recommendations?

Yes. The report is intended to help your team or development partner understand the priority, rationale, and recommended action. Any implementation support from me is scoped separately.

Is this a security audit?

Security is one part of the technical review. It does not replace a specialist penetration test, formal audit, or certification process. The report will state what was reviewed and where further assessment may be needed.

WORKING TOGETHER

A defined assessment, with a clear finish.

The fixed fee buys an agreed review and a written decision tool. It is scoped around one application; the supporting systems and depth are named in the proposal.

Inputs before the review starts

An application overview, the questions you need answered, a system walkthrough, and the agreed evidence or read-only access. A team member should be available to explain important workflows and constraints.

A delivery date agreed up front

Confirm the assessment schedule once the scope and inputs are known. The 90-day roadmap describes the work recommended after the assessment; it is not the time taken to conduct the review.

Depth matched to the decision

The review may inspect selected code paths, configurations, dependencies, performance evidence, deployment practices, and recovery arrangements. The report states what was examined, what was unavailable, and which questions need further investigation.

A report, roadmap, and debrief

Receive an executive summary, prioritized findings with evidence and recommended actions, architecture observations, and a Now / Next / Later roadmap. Discuss the handoff with the people who will own the next work.

A DIRECT CONVERSATION

Have a technology decision
you need to get right?

Tell me what’s happening. I’ll let you know whether I can help
and how I’d approach the next step.

Talk to Jonathan No sales team. You’ll talk directly with me.