A security questionnaire is holding up a customer conversation, and the answers need to reflect how your systems really work.
Supporting capability
Make security requirements part of how engineering works.
Translate enterprise security expectations into practical engineering work. Connect access controls, cloud configuration, software delivery, and operational evidence to the way your team actually runs its systems.
Talk to JonathanScoped individually
A focused engagement based on your systems, current controls, and customer or audit requirements. Scope and pricing are agreed before work begins.
THE WHOLE SYSTEM, IN VIEW
Business strategyArchitecture
Clarity at the center.IntegrationSecurity & engineering
Clarity at the center.STRATEGY ↔ EXECUTIONA connected perspective
IS THIS THE RIGHT FIT?
When customer requirements reach engineering.
- SaaS companies whose enterprise customers are asking more detailed security questions.
- Engineering teams preparing to support a SOC 2 program with technical controls and evidence.
- Leaders who need to understand what their cloud and software delivery practices can actually demonstrate.
SITUATIONS I CAN HELP WITH01 02 03
Policies exist, but access reviews, deployment controls, logging, or vulnerability management are inconsistent in practice.
Engineering needs to turn audit or customer requirements into owned work without treating every request as an emergency.
WHAT YOU LEAVE WITH
Controls the team can operate.
A clearer view of engineering control gaps, named responsibilities, and a prioritized plan for the technical work behind customer security reviews and compliance readiness.
Requirements translated into engineering work
Review the relevant customer or compliance expectations and identify the systems, controls, and evidence engineering needs to support.
Selected control review
Assess agreed areas such as cloud access, MFA, permissions, logging, backups, recovery, vulnerability handling, and deployment controls.
Practical ownership and evidence
Identify who maintains each control, how it operates, and what records can substantiate it. Surface gaps between documented policy and actual practice.
A prioritized readiness plan
Sequence the agreed improvements around risk, dependencies, and team capacity. Support accurate technical responses to security questions within scope.
THE ENGAGEMENTA clear process.
01 02 03
A clear process.
Shared expectations.
Define the requirements
Start with the customer request, readiness objective, or control concerns. Agree on the systems and engineering responsibilities in scope.
Check how the controls operate
Review configurations, workflows, and available evidence with the people responsible. Make assumptions and limitations explicit.
Turn gaps into owned work
Build a practical improvement plan and clarify the evidence needed to show that each agreed control is operating.
SCOPE & BOUNDARIESKnow what
Know what
you’re engaging.
This is engineering readiness and technical guidance. It is not a formal audit, certification service, legal opinion, penetration test, or guarantee of SOC 2 compliance. Your auditor or compliance specialist remains responsible for formal interpretation and attestation.
Can you certify us for SOC 2?
No. I help with the engineering systems, practices, and evidence that can support readiness. A qualified independent auditor performs the SOC 2 examination and issues the report.
Can you work alongside our compliance provider?
Yes. I can help translate their requirements into technical decisions and engineering tasks, subject to the agreed scope. We clarify responsibilities so requirements, implementation, and evidence stay connected.
Do we need a full compliance program to get help?
No. The engagement can address a specific customer questionnaire, cloud security concern, or engineering control gap. We start with the actual requirement and define a proportionate scope.
WORKING TOGETHER
Engineering work with named owners.
Use the customer request or readiness objective to define the work. Keep the technical implementation connected to the people responsible for operating and reviewing it.
Identify the actual requirement
Bring the questionnaire, control concern, or readiness plan. Confirm the systems and responsibilities in scope with your compliance provider or auditor where needed.
Connect policy to practice
Trace selected requirements into configurations, access paths, development workflows, and recovery procedures. Distinguish an implemented control from a stated intention.
Make recurring work maintainable
For each agreed improvement, name an owner, an operating procedure, a review trigger, and the evidence needed to show it happened.
Plan the implementation
Separate urgent corrections from changes that depend on the product roadmap, another provider, or a wider organizational decision. Agree any hands-on implementation as a defined scope.
A DIRECT CONVERSATIONHave a technology decision
Have a technology decision
you need to get right?
Tell me what’s happening. I’ll let you know whether I can help
and how I’d approach the next step.